Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752521AbcDOIwj (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:52:39 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:47843 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751591AbcDOIwg (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:52:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System To: Greg KH , Vladimir Murzin References: <1459519381-34441-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> <570F593D.6040809@arm.com> <20160414192540.GD20512@kroah.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla , arnd@arndb.de, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, liviu.dudau@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, peter@hurleysoftware.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <5710ABC4.5070505@arm.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:52:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160414192540.GD20512@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1110 Lines: 41 On 14/04/16 20:25, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:47:57AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 01/04/16 15:02, Vladimir Murzin wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patch series provides the basic support for running ucLinux on V2M-MPS2 >>> platform. >>> >>> With these patches applied ucLinux can be run on both HW and FVP models >>> with Cortex-M3/M4/M7 configurations. >> >> Any objection to get it merged? >> >> Sudeep Holla noticed that there is merge conflict against linux-next >> with PIC32 uart (Makefile and serial_core.h), so should I provide >> conflict resolution or do rebase on someone's branch? >> >> Anyway, I'd be glad to know how it should be processed further? > > I have no objection to the tty/serial changes, so if this all goes > through the arm-soc tree, that's fine with me. > Thanks Greg, can I take this as Ack ? arm-soc guys might expect to see that tag :) Hi Vladimir, I have pulled this series into git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git for-next/armv7-vexpress-updates I will stick Greg's tag when it comes. -- Regards, Sudeep