Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751884AbcDOPVS (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:21:18 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:51039 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751176AbcDOPVQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:21:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:21:09 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Grygorii Strashko Cc: Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Santosh Shilimkar , Sekhar Nori , Linux-OMAP , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Roger Quadros Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: fix irq triggering in smart-idle wakeup mode Message-ID: <20160415152109.GQ5995@atomide.com> References: <1460458351-24187-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <5710B3B9.4090807@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5710B3B9.4090807@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1242 Lines: 37 * Grygorii Strashko [160415 02:27]: > On 04/15/2016 11:32 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Grygorii Strashko > > wrote: > > > >> Now GPIO IRQ loss is observed on dra7-evm after suspend/resume cycle > > (...) > >> Cc: Roger Quadros > >> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko > > > > Can I get some explicit ACK / Tested-by tags for this patch? > > Roger's promised to test it once suspend regression will be fixed > for dra7-evm, probably next rc. > > > > > Is it a serious regression that will need to go in as a fix and > > tagged for stable? > > > > This issue is here since 2012, so I think it's not very critical - > It seems bits combination which causing the issue is rare. > > Regarding stable: > 4.4 - good to have, simple merge conflict > 4.1 - some merge resolution is required > older kernel - it will be hard to backport it due to significant > changes in omap gpio driver > > Santosh, Tony, do you want me to perform any additional actions regarding this patch? Well maybe update the comments regarding non-interrupt GPIO lines and wake-up events. Santosh may have other comments. Regards, Tony