Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752024AbcDOPYV (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:24:21 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55953 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751333AbcDOPYU (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:24:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:24:17 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Juergen Gross Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , George Dunlap , Matt Fleming , jeffm@suse.com, Michael Chang , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jim Fehlig , Jan Beulich , "H. Peter Anvin" , Daniel Kiper , the arch/x86 maintainers , Takashi Iwai , =?utf-8?Q?Vojt=C4=9Bch_Pavl=C3=ADk?= , Gary Lin , xen-devel , Jeffrey Cheung , Stefano Stabellini , joeyli , Borislav Petkov , Boris Ostrovsky , Charles Arndol , Andrew Cooper , Julien Grall , Andy Lutomirski , David Vrabel , Linus Torvalds , Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] HVMLite / PVHv2 - using x86 EFI boot entry Message-ID: <20160415152417.GW1990@wotan.suse.de> References: <20160406024027.GX1990@wotan.suse.de> <20160407185148.GL1990@wotan.suse.de> <20160413195257.GB1990@wotan.suse.de> <570F68AB.2040400@citrix.com> <20160414194408.GP1990@wotan.suse.de> <57108121.1070307@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57108121.1070307@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 868 Lines: 21 On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 07:50:25AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 14/04/16 21:44, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > No, I meant to ask, would it be possible to make booting HVMLite using EFI > > be optional ? That way if you already support EFI that can be used on > > your entires with some small modifications. > > So you suggest to add two HVMlite modes regarding boot interface > instead of one? Not suggest, I'm evaluating what options we have available. That's very different from suggesting. That's the point to this whole topic, pure and simple evaluation of options. > Given how long the EFI standard is available now and how buggy many > vendor's implementations are I don't expect all computers sold in 5 > years will have a usable EFI. This will be true especially for > consumer devices where no EFI is available today. Thanks this really helps. Luis