Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:54:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:54:14 -0500 Received: from verdi.et.tudelft.nl ([130.161.38.158]:65408 "EHLO verdi.et.tudelft.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:54:13 -0500 Message-Id: <200303222005.h2MK5D004881@verdi.et.tudelft.nl> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: linux-kernel To: Doug McNaught Cc: robn@verdi.et.tudelft.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4 has O_SYNC bug ? In-Reply-To: Your message of "22 Mar 2003 14:37:53 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:05:13 +0100 From: Rob van Nieuwkerk Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 846 Lines: 21 > Rob van Nieuwkerk writes: > > > But the strange thing is this: always after 30s the kernel performs > > extra writes to the CF. It seems it's flushing some kind of dirty buffer > > from the buffer cache. But there is not supposed to be any dirty buffer: > > all data should have been written already to the CF because the partition > > was opened with O_SYNC ! > > noatime? For what ? As you can read in my posting there is no file-system for the data area, just a raw partition. And the root-fs is mounted read-only (and not even active btw) .. Rob van Nieuwkerk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/