Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:22:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:22:17 -0500 Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:33015 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:22:17 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:33:06 +0100 (MET) From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox cc: Dominik Brodowski , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.5.65-ac2 -- hda/ide trouble on ICH4 In-Reply-To: <1048375677.9219.42.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 783 Lines: 22 On 22 Mar 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 22:03, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Previously callers called it with masked_irq=0 and disabling/enabling > > hwif->irq code wasn't executed, now ide_do_request() is called with > > masked_irq=IDE_NO_IRQ=-1 so this code is executed for sure. > > You are right - I botched the simplification of that. The logic is actually > cleaner than I did with a bit more thought - IDE_NO_IRQ can go away and > we should be using hwif->irq as the argument. I think so. -- Bartlomiej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/