Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:52:02 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
        mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h
Message-ID: <20160415235202.GA26940@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 405
Lines: 10

Hello, Frederic,

One thing that I have had on my list for some time is to rearrange the
RCU source code to make it easier to find things.  Given our discussion
yesterday, this seemed like a good time to take that step with the
expedited grace-period code.  I have a couple of commits doing this in
-rcu, and would like your opinion.  Worthwhile, or should I revert those
two commits?

							Thanx, Paul