Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:34:57 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h
Message-ID: <20160417023457.GI3687@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
References: <20160415235202.GA26940@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20160416130831.GA29917@lerouge>
 <1388559142.60584.1460820549723.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1388559142.60584.1460820549723.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1071
Lines: 26

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 03:29:09PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Frederic Weisbecker fweisbec@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> Hello, Frederic,
> >> 
> >> One thing that I have had on my list for some time is to rearrange the
> >> RCU source code to make it easier to find things.  Given our discussion
> >> yesterday, this seemed like a good time to take that step with the
> >> expedited grace-period code.  I have a couple of commits doing this in
> >> -rcu, and would like your opinion.  Worthwhile, or should I revert those
> >> two commits?
> > 
> > It's definetly worth having a look! And it might help me eventually understand
> > that expedited grace period thing :-)

And for me to document it.  ;-)

> Moving the expedited handling into its own files indeed
> seems to better organize the sub-parts of RCU. That seems
> like a good idea.

Sounds good, will give it a try.  If it works well, I might do the same
for other sub-parts of RCU.

							Thanx, Paul