Message-ID: <1460908959.19090.95.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Whine about ACCESS_ONCE
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 09:02:39 -0700
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604171337450.2034@localhost6.localdomain6>
References: <1460828078-5224-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
	 <1460833453.19090.79.camel@perches.com>
	 <1460836099.19090.82.camel@perches.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604170743060.2068@localhost6.localdomain6>
	 <1460881671.19090.90.camel@perches.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604171337450.2034@localhost6.localdomain6>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 440
Lines: 11

On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 13:39 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> A suitably versatile semantic patch is below.? Feel free to update?
> at?least the copyright line, and perhaps the initial explanation
> and the?strings printed in report and org modes.

Seems sensible enough, thanks Julia.

// Copyright: (C) 2016 Joe Perches, afffiliation?, license?

The structure is all your work so you can mark it as
you please, but for me 'no rights reserved'