Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:17:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:17:16 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:11254 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:17:00 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:16:44 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: Wakko Warner Cc: root , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: need to suggest a good FS: Message-ID: <20010223021644.A12506@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <3A95A94E.E3C84BE4@hkicable.com> <20010222195707.A30319@animx.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20010222195707.A30319@animx.eu.org>; from wakko@animx.eu.org on Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:57:07PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:57:07PM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote: > > anyone can suggest some good FS that can install linux? > > exclude reiserfs, ext2, ext3, DOS FAT..etc > > just need non-normal or non-popular FS, any suggestion? > > How about minixfs? >=) ADFS, AFFS, BFS or HPFS are all uncommon and unpopular (especially in the case of AFFS, if I understood Alexander Viro's woes correctly), QNX4 might do too, then there's always NTFS; guaranteed to make your day... SysV5, UFS and UDF are probably too easy to get going, or?! /David _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/