Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 05:38:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 05:38:10 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:16873 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 05:38:08 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 11:49:16 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Alan Cox Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: IDE todo list Message-ID: <20030323104916.GI837@suse.de> References: <1048352492.9219.4.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1048352492.9219.4.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 972 Lines: 23 On Sat, Mar 22 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > - Finish verifying 256 sector I/O or larger on LBA48 > [How to handle change dynamically on hotplug ?] That is basically impossible. How are you going to handle the case where you have a queue full of 256 request writes, and the plugged in disk chokes on them? And insolvable unless you start setting aside requests simply for this purpose. Also breaks the pseudo atomic segments that a single request represents. This is just way beyond ugly... This is a generic problem of course, and the typical answer is to go by the rules of the lowest common denominator if hot plug can cause you queue limits to be violated (may be other problems than simply max sector count). -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/