Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751915AbcDRK2Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 06:28:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:33976 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751532AbcDRK2O (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 06:28:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:58:10 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Al Stone , ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Force cppc_cpufreq to report values in KHz to fix user space reporting Message-ID: <20160418102810.GC2322@vireshk-i7> References: <1460758594-1596-1-git-send-email-ahs3@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1460758594-1596-1-git-send-email-ahs3@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5126 Lines: 153 Cc'ing Ashwin. -- viresh On 15-04-16, 16:16, Al Stone wrote: > When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as > cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect. > > What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables > in whatever scale was used to provide them. However, the ACPI spec > defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers. Internal kernel > structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values > to be in KHz. When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the > user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report > incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when > it should be 1.8GHz). > > While the investigation for a long term fix proceeds (several options > are being explored, some of which may require spec changes or other > much more invasive fixes), this patch forces the values read by CPPC > to be read in KHz, regardless of what they actually represent. > > The downside is that this approach has some assumptions: > > (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency > value for a processor is set to a non-zero value. > > (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed. This > patch retrieves the first CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI > record that it can find. This may not be an issue, however, as a > sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only > one such record regardless. > > For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on > firmware values being set correctly. Hence, other approaches are > also being considered. > > This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with > and without CPPC support. > > Signed-off-by: Al Stone > --- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 1 + > 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > index 8adac69..049dced 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > + > +#include > > #include > /* > @@ -709,6 +712,47 @@ static int cpc_write(struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 val) > return ret_val; > } > > +static u64 cppc_dmi_khz; > + > +static void cppc_find_dmi_mhz(const struct dmi_header *dm, void *private) > +{ > + u16 *mhz = (u16 *)private; > + const u8 *dmi_data = (const u8 *)dm; > + > + if (dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_PROCESSOR && dm->length >= 48) > + *mhz = (u16)get_unaligned((const u16 *)(dmi_data + 0x14)); > +} > + > + > +static u64 cppc_get_dmi_khz(void) > +{ > + u16 mhz; > + > + dmi_walk(cppc_find_dmi_mhz, &mhz); > + > + /* > + * Real stupid fallback value, just in case there is no > + * actual value set. > + */ > + mhz = mhz ? mhz : 1; > + > + return (1000 * mhz); > +} > + > +static u64 cppc_unitless_to_khz(u64 min, u64 max, u64 val) > +{ > + /* > + * The incoming val should be min <= val <= max. Our > + * job is to convert that to KHz so it can be properly > + * reported to user space via cpufreq_policy. > + */ > + > + if (!cppc_dmi_khz) > + cppc_dmi_khz = cppc_get_dmi_khz(); > + > + return ((val - min) * cppc_dmi_khz) / (max - min); > +} > + > /** > * cppc_get_perf_caps - Get a CPUs performance capabilities. > * @cpunum: CPU from which to get capabilities info. > @@ -748,17 +792,24 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps) > } > } > > + /* > + * Since these values in perf_caps will be used in setting > + * up the cpufreq policy, they must always be stored in units > + * of KHz. If they are not, user space tools will become very > + * confused since they assume these are in KHz when reading > + * sysfs. > + */ > cpc_read(&highest_reg->cpc_entry.reg, &high); > - perf_caps->highest_perf = high; > - > cpc_read(&lowest_reg->cpc_entry.reg, &low); > - perf_caps->lowest_perf = low; > + > + perf_caps->highest_perf = cppc_unitless_to_khz(low, high, high); > + perf_caps->lowest_perf = cppc_unitless_to_khz(low, high, low); > > cpc_read(&ref_perf->cpc_entry.reg, &ref); > - perf_caps->reference_perf = ref; > + perf_caps->reference_perf = cppc_unitless_to_khz(low, high, ref); > > cpc_read(&nom_perf->cpc_entry.reg, &nom); > - perf_caps->nominal_perf = nom; > + perf_caps->nominal_perf = cppc_unitless_to_khz(low, high, nom); > > if (!ref) > perf_caps->reference_perf = perf_caps->nominal_perf; > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > index 14b1f93..0573982 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ config ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ > tristate "CPUFreq driver based on the ACPI CPPC spec" > depends on ACPI > select ACPI_CPPC_LIB > + select DMI > default n > help > This adds a CPUFreq driver which uses CPPC methods > -- > 2.5.5