Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752158AbcDRN5h (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:57:37 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:59684 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751174AbcDRN5f (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:57:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] watchdog: add driver for StreamLabs USB watchdog device To: Oliver Neukum , Alexey Klimov References: <1460948016-5453-1-git-send-email-klimov.linux@gmail.com> <1460968368.25119.7.camel@suse.com> Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, yury.norov@gmail.com, wim@iguana.be, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <5714E7D3.4030809@roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 06:57:39 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1460968368.25119.7.camel@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2463 Lines: 83 On 04/18/2016 01:32 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 03:53 +0100, Alexey Klimov wrote: >> This patch creates new driver that supports StreamLabs usb watchdog >> device. This device plugs into 9-pin usb header and connects to >> reset pin and reset button on common PC. >> >> USB commands used to communicate with device were reverse >> engineered using usbmon. > > Almost. I see only one issue. > >> +struct streamlabs_wdt { >> + struct watchdog_device wdt_dev; >> + struct usb_interface *intf; >> + >> + struct mutex lock; >> + u8 buffer[BUFFER_LENGTH]; > > That is wrong. > >> +}; >> + > > [..] > >> +static int usb_streamlabs_wdt_command(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev, u16 cmd) >> +{ >> + struct streamlabs_wdt *streamlabs_wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdt_dev); >> + struct usb_device *usbdev; >> + int retval; >> + int size; >> + unsigned long timeout_msec; >> + >> + int retry_counter = 10; /* how many times to re-send stop cmd */ >> + >> + mutex_lock(&streamlabs_wdt->lock); >> + >> + if (unlikely(!streamlabs_wdt->intf)) { >> + mutex_unlock(&streamlabs_wdt->lock); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + usbdev = interface_to_usbdev(streamlabs_wdt->intf); >> + timeout_msec = wdt_dev->timeout * MSEC_PER_SEC; >> + >> + do { >> + usb_streamlabs_wdt_prepare_buf((u16 *) streamlabs_wdt->buffer, >> + cmd, timeout_msec); >> + /* send command to watchdog */ >> + retval = usb_interrupt_msg(usbdev, usb_sndintpipe(usbdev, 0x02), >> + streamlabs_wdt->buffer, BUFFER_TRANSFER_LENGTH, > > Because of this line. > > The problem is subtle. Your buffer and your lock share a cacheline. > On some architecture the cache is not consistent with respect to DMA. > On them cachelines holding a buffer for DMA need to be flushed to RAM > and invalidated and you may read from them only after DMA has finished. > > Thus you may have prepared a cacheline for DMA but somebody tries taking > the lock. Then the cacheline with the lock is read from RAM. If that > happens before you finish the DMA the data resulting from DMA is lost. > > The fix is to allocate the buffer with its own allocation. The VM > subsystem makes sure separate allocation don't share cachelines. > Hi Oliver, For my own education, would adding ____cacheline_aligned to the buffer variable declaration solve the problem as well ? Thanks, Guenter > That is the long explanation for what I mean when I say that you violate > the DMA rules. > > Regards > Oliver > > >