Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:30:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:30:03 -0500 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:734 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:30:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 20:41:02 +0100 From: Tomas Szepe To: Martin Mares Cc: Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik , Stephan von Krawczynski , Pavel Machek , arjanv@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25 Message-ID: <20030323194102.GF31079@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030323192503.GA14181@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200303231930.h2NJUXv13667@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030323193457.GA14750@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030323193457.GA14750@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 668 Lines: 18 > [mj@ucw.cz] > > > There are vendors, there are free distributions too. > > Yes, but that's pretty irrelevant. People should not depend on such > sources to get security fixes. Anything so critical should be included > in the official kernel as soon as possible -- any reasons against? What troubles *me* is that obviously I have missed the post with Marcelo's opinion on this. -- Tomas Szepe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/