Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:36:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:36:13 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:54801 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:36:12 -0500 Subject: Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25 From: Robert Love To: Martin Mares Cc: Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik , Stephan von Krawczynski , Pavel Machek , szepe@pinerecords.com, arjanv@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030323194423.GC14750@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20030323193457.GA14750@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200303231938.h2NJcAq14927@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030323194423.GC14750@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1048448838.1486.12.camel@phantasy.awol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 23 Mar 2003 14:47:19 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 687 Lines: 19 On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 14:44, Martin Mares wrote: > Do you really think that "People should either use vendor kernels or > read LKML and be able to gather the fixes from there themselves" is a > good strategy? Yes, I suspect he does as do most people here. If you do not use a vendor kernel then you assume the responsibility of doing this stuff yourself. If you do not want to worry about these things, use a vendor kernel. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/