Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754307AbcDSMv4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:51:56 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:55831 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752861AbcDSMvy (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:51:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 39/50] mtd: nand: omap2: switch to mtd_ooblayout_ops To: Boris Brezillon References: <1459354505-32551-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1459354505-32551-40-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <5714F011.5080409@ti.com> <20160418170518.363f732d@bbrezillon> <57160862.90603@ti.com> <20160419132206.5d909f7e@bbrezillon> <571624EF.9060707@ti.com> <20160419144152.30a4027d@bbrezillon> CC: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , , Richard Weinberger , , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Harvey Hunt , Nicolas Ferre , Stefan Agner , , Alexandre Belloni , punnaiah choudary kalluri , Robert Jarzmik , , Archit Taneja , , Kamal Dasu , Josh Wu , Chen-Yu Tsai , Kukjin Kim , , Ezequiel Garcia , Huang Shijie , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Haojian Zhuang , Han Xu , , Priit Laes , Greg Kroah-Hartman , , Ralf Baechle , Wenyou Yang , Kyungmin Park , , Maxime Ripard , Daniel Mack From: Roger Quadros Message-ID: <57162966.9080205@ti.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:49:42 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160419144152.30a4027d@bbrezillon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3016 Lines: 94 On 19/04/16 15:41, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:30:39 +0300 > Roger Quadros wrote: > >> On 19/04/16 14:22, Boris Brezillon wrote: >>> Hi Roger, >>> >>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:28:50 +0300 >>> Roger Quadros wrote: >>> >>>>> @@ -1921,6 +1927,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>>> nand_chip->ecc.correct = omap_correct_data; >>>>> mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &omap_ooblayout_ops); >>>>> oobbytes_per_step = nand_chip->ecc.bytes; >>>>> + >>>>> + if (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) >>>>> + min_oobbytes = 1; >>>> >>>> Shouldn't this have been >>>> if (!(nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) >>>> min_oobbytes = 1; >>>> ? >>> >>> Yep. >>> >>>> >>>>> break; >>>>> >>>>> case OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW: >>>>> @@ -2038,10 +2047,8 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> /* check if NAND device's OOB is enough to store ECC signatures */ >>>>> - min_oobbytes = (oobbytes_per_step * >>>>> - (mtd->writesize / nand_chip->ecc.size)) + >>>>> - (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? >>>>> - BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH : 1); >>>>> + min_oobbytes += (oobbytes_per_step * >>>>> + (mtd->writesize / nand_chip->ecc.size)); >>>>> if (mtd->oobsize < min_oobbytes) { >>>>> dev_err(&info->pdev->dev, >>>>> "not enough OOB bytes required = %d, available=%d\n", >>>>> >>>> >>>> After the above changes BCH with HW ECC worked fine but BCH with SW ECC still failed. >>>> I had to fix it up with the below patch. This is mainly because chip->ecc.steps wasn't >>>> yet initialized before calling nand_bch_init(). >>>> >>>> After the below patch it worked fine with bch4 (hw & sw), bch8 (hw & sw) and ham1. >>>> I couldn't yet verify bch16 though. >>> >> >> I just verified that bch16 works as well. >> >>> Thanks for the fix, but I'd prefer fixing the bug for all soft BCH >>> users. >>> >>> Could you try this patch? >> >> I tried your patch and it worked fine. > > Thanks, I'll provide a reworked nand/next branch soon. > BTW, is there anything to fix in my merge commit (the commit merging > your GPMC/OMAP changes in nand/next)? > I just replied in the other thread that the conflict resolution is fine. >> You will still need the below change to omap2.c >> >> -- >> cheers, >> -roger >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c >> index 0abfba6..33c8fde 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c >> @@ -1715,7 +1715,7 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, >> struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); >> int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH; >> >> - if (section) >> + if (section >= chip->ecc.steps) >> return -ERANGE; > > Sorry but I don't get why we need that one. Don't we have a single > oobfree section starting at the end of the ECC sections? > > You are right. Nothing needs to be changed there then. Thanks :) cheers, -roger