Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 12:33:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 12:33:19 -0500 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([207.109.151.240]:19213 "EHLO vger.timpanogas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 12:33:01 -0500 Message-ID: <3A0052D3.32326393@timpanogas.org> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:28:51 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" Organization: TRG, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Altaparmakov CC: Andrea Arcangeli , Larry McVoy , Paul Menage , Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! In-Reply-To: <39FF49C8.475C2EA7@timpanogas.org> <39FF3D53.C46EB1A8@timpanogas.org> <20001031140534.A22819@work.bitmover.com> <39FF4488.83B6C1CE@timpanogas.org> <20001031142733.A23516@work.bitmover.com> <39FF49C8.475C2EA7@timpanogas.org> <5.0.0.25.2.20001101094152.03caed30@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > IMHO stability is more important than anything else. - I prefer to run 20 > Linux servers which will result in no phonecalls at midnight calling me > into College to reboot them compared to a Netware server which runs as fast > as the 20 Linux servers but disturbs my out-of-working-hours time! > > I agree that having ring 0 OS will improve performance, no doubt about > that, but at what price? > It depends on how well we do out job. I guess that's the real debate. Welcome back, how's things. :-) Jeff > Just my 2p. > > Anton > > >And on sane architectures like alpha you don't even need to flush the TLB > >during "real" context switching so all your worry to share the same VM for > >everything is almost irrelevant there since it happens all the time anyways > >(until you overflow the available ASN bits that takes a lots of forks to > >happen). > > > >So IMHO for you it's much saner to move all your performance critical code > >into > >kernel space (that will be just stability-risky enough as khttpd and tux are). > >In 2.4.x that will avoid all the cr3 reloads and that will be enough as what > >you really care during fileserving are the copies that you must avoid. > > > >Andrea > >- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- > "Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he > learned in school." - Albert Einstein > -- > Anton Altaparmakov Voice: +44-(0)1223-333541(lab) / +44-(0)7712-632205(mobile) > Christ's College eMail: AntonA@bigfoot.com / aia21@cam.ac.uk > Cambridge CB2 3BU ICQ: 8561279 > United Kingdom WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/