Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:08:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:08:51 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:28472 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:08:50 -0500 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200303232319.h2NNJqs13257@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25 To: mbligh@aracnet.com (Martin J. Bligh) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:19:52 -0500 (EST) Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com (Jeff Garzik), jbourne@mtroyal.ab.ca (James Bourne), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rml@tech9.net (Robert Love), mj@ucw.cz (Martin Mares), alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), skraw@ithnet.com (Stephan von Krawczynski), szepe@pinerecords.com, arjanv@redhat.com, pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) In-Reply-To: <1240000.1048460079@[10.10.2.4]> from "Martin J. Bligh" at Mar 23, 2003 02:54:40 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 630 Lines: 13 > O(1) sched may be a bad example ... how about the fact that mainline VM > is totally unstable? Witness, for instance, the buffer_head stuff. Fixes > for that have been around for ages. On normal computers 2.4.21pre VM is very stable, in fact I dumped the rmap vm from -ac because its far better at the moment Most people don't care about 32 way scaling of 16Gb boxes running EVMS. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/