Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754187AbcDTEXt (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:23:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38126 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752319AbcDTEXs (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:23:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:23:40 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Davidlohr Bueso , akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock() Message-ID: <20160420042340.GD3472@linux-uzut.site> References: <1460829336-6146-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> <5716238D.6040308@sandisk.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5716238D.6040308@sandisk.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 486 Lines: 16 On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Bart Van Assche wrote: >On 04/16/2016 01:55 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >>... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, >>therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. > >Hello Davidlohr, > >Are you sure that this patch has been sent to the right person? I have >helped to review a change in this code but I'm not the maintainer of >this code. Ah, adding Andrew and Ingo, not sure who is responsible for these bits. Thanks, Davidlohr