Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264008AbTCWX6I>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:58:08 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264009AbTCWX6H>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:58:07 -0500
Received: from maild.telia.com ([194.22.190.101]:46571 "EHLO maild.telia.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S264008AbTCWX6G>;
	Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:58:06 -0500
X-Original-Recipient: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 01:09:00 +0100
From: Christian Axelsson <smiler@lanil.mine.nu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25
Message-Id: <20030324010900.599faca3.smiler@lanil.mine.nu>
In-Reply-To: <6850000.1048463137@[10.10.2.4]>
References: <20030323193457.GA14750@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
	<200303231938.h2NJcAq14927@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
	<20030323194423.GC14750@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
	<1048448838.1486.12.camel@phantasy.awol.org>
	<20030323195606.GA15904@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
	<1048450211.1486.19.camel@phantasy.awol.org>
	<402760000.1048451441@[10.10.2.4]>
	<20030323203628.GA16025@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
	<Pine.LNX.4.51.0303231410250.17155@skuld.mtroyal.ab.ca>
	<920000.1048456387@[10.10.2.4]>
	<3E7E335C.2050509@pobox.com>
	<1240000.1048460079@[10.10.2.4]>
	<3E7E4486.8080302@pobox.com>
	<6850000.1048463137@[10.10.2.4]>
Organization: LANIL
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary=",RT'Qu1S+Un5yx=."
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1196
Lines: 39

--,RT'Qu1S+Un5yx=.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 15:45:38 -0800
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> wrote:

<snip>
> Common vendor _features_ is maybe better done in a separate tree, I'd
> accept ... I'm just frustrated with the current lack of commonality between
> distros, I guess.
</snip>

Excuse me for breaking in, but after reading this thread for a while I have a
suggestion to make: if you feel that a 2.4.xx-extrafeatures is needed try to get
a couple of guys together and start up your own branch of patches :)
I would be one that's willing to try it out.

-- 
Christan Axelsson
smiler@lanil.mine.nu

--,RT'Qu1S+Un5yx=.
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+fkyjyqbmAWw8VdkRAqn6AJ0Xhe/6/vXO1sbUYK/NS1uw9H1s+QCgvZp7
q3lg96XIPIYdQehAKcJkIeE=
=/r3s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--,RT'Qu1S+Un5yx=.--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/