Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264000AbTCXAEC>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:04:02 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264002AbTCXAEC>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:04:02 -0500
Received: from s161-184-77-200.ab.hsia.telus.net ([161.184.77.200]:43170 "EHLO
	cafe.hardrock.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S264000AbTCXAEB>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:04:01 -0500
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 17:15:05 -0700 (MST)
From: James Bourne <jbourne@hardrock.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Subject: Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25
In-Reply-To: <1470000.1048460259@[10.10.2.4]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303231713230.19670-100000@cafe.hardrock.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1048
Lines: 28

On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

> > is ALL I propose to want to include.  Perhaps if the vendors
> > want a "common vendor" patch they could maintain it? ;)
> 
> I still think the common vendor kernel is valuable, but different ;-)
> A straight fixes tree is valuable too ... thanks.

I do agree that it would be valuable, just not my bag.

Regards
James Bourne (different email address due to disclaimer chaos)

> M.

-- 
James Bourne                  | Email:            jbourne@hardrock.org          
Unix Systems Administrator    | WWW:           http://www.hardrock.org
Custom Unix Programming       | Linux:  The choice of a GNU generation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "All you need's an occasional kick in the philosophy." Frank Herbert  


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/