Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932761AbcDTHyQ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 20 Apr 2016 03:54:16 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34367 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752457AbcDTHyP (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 20 Apr 2016 03:54:15 -0400
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:54:06 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pi3orama@163.com,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] perf record: Split output into multiple files via
 '--switch-output'
Message-ID: <20160420075406.GC25541@krava.redhat.com>
References: <1460991332-185772-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
 <1460991332-185772-3-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1460991332-185772-3-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1092
Lines: 35

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 02:55:28PM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:

SNIP

>  		    "Record build-id of all DSOs regardless of hits"),
>  	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "timestamp-filename", &record.timestamp_filename,
>  		    "append timestamp to output filename"),
> +	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "switch-output", &record.switch_output,
> +		    "Switch output when receive SIGUSR2"),
>  	OPT_END()
>  };
>  
> @@ -1413,10 +1440,13 @@ out_symbol_exit:
>  
>  static void snapshot_sig_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
>  {
> -	if (!auxtrace_snapshot_is_ready())
> -		return;
> -	auxtrace_snapshot_toggle();
> -	auxtrace_record__snapshot_started = 1;
> -	if (auxtrace_record__snapshot_start(record.itr))
> -		auxtrace_snapshot_error();
> +	if (auxtrace_snapshot_is_ready()) {
> +		auxtrace_snapshot_toggle();
> +		auxtrace_record__snapshot_started = 1;
> +		if (auxtrace_record__snapshot_start(record.itr))
> +			auxtrace_snapshot_error();

Adrian,
I know it's out of the scope of this patchset, however
should auxtrace_record__snapshot_start call be in the
__cmd_record's loop path rather then in here in signal? 

thanks,
jirka