Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932934AbcDTOEf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:04:35 -0400
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:18972 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754541AbcDTOEd (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:04:33 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,509,1455004800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="949188037"
Message-ID: <1461161133.6620.304.camel@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] serial: 8250: split LPSS to 8250_lpss, enable
 DMA on Quark
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        ismo.puustinen@intel.com,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:05:33 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20160420132910.GB2274@localhost>
References: <1460379071-132591-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
	 <20160420132910.GB2274@localhost>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1-1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1154
Lines: 34

On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 18:59 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:51:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > This is combined series of two things:
> > - split out the Intel LPSS specific driver from 8250_pci into
> > 8250_lpss
> > - enable DMA support on Intel Quark UART
> > 
> > The patch has been tested on few Intel SoCs / platforms.
> > 
> > This is targeting serial subsystem, thus it would be nice to get and
> > Ack from Vinod first.
> > Moreover, the series depends on [1] that is now under review.
> > 
> > That's why I asked Vinod to create immutable tag / branch for the
> > [1] and the
> > dependants (at least one more, which is sata_dwc_460ex).
> The dmaengine bits look fine to me but this is dependent on another dw
> series which is undergoing changes.

Yes, I have to work on one patch at least (data-width property).

> 
> I was thinking that it might be easier to merge the series thru
> dmaengine
> tree if Greg is okay with it. If not once all dw patches are merged I
> will
> give immutable signed tag

It would work for me too. Greg?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy