Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 07:02:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 07:02:22 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:65466 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 07:02:21 -0500 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200303241213.h2OCD6u21467@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [IDE SiI680] throughput drop to 1/4 To: samel@mail.cz (Vitezslav Samel) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 07:13:06 -0500 (EST) Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), andre@linux-ide.org (Andre Hedrick), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030324072910.GA16596@pc11.op.pod.cz> from "Vitezslav Samel" at Mar 24, 2003 08:29:10 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 14 > Recently I tried to figure out in 2.5.65, why throughput on my disk which > hangs on Silicon Image 680 dropped to 1/4 compared to 2.4.21-pre5, but didn't > found anything useful. Are there any known issues with this driver? The same code in both cases. Its quite likely the problem is higher up in the block or filesystem layer. It might also be a general IDE layer bug What does performance look like on your other disk between 2.4.21pre/2.5.65 ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/