Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751770AbcDUKT5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 06:19:57 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:53775 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751340AbcDUKTz (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 06:19:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:19:30 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Jianqun Xu , will.deacon@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, heiko@sntech.de, huangtao@rock-chips.com, davidriley@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org, jwerner@chromium.org, smbarber@chromium.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for RK3399 SoCs Message-ID: <20160421101930.GG6879@leverpostej> References: <1461122150-9042-1-git-send-email-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> <1461211092-26331-1-git-send-email-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1461211092-26331-1-git-send-email-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1032 Lines: 35 On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:58:12AM +0800, Jianqun Xu wrote: > + cpu_l0: cpu@0 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8"; > + reg = <0x0 0x0>; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ > + clocks = <&cru ARMCLKL>; > + }; > + cpu_b0: cpu@100 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a72", "arm,armv8"; > + reg = <0x0 0x100>; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */ > + clocks = <&cru ARMCLKB>; > + }; > + > + arm-pmu { > + compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3"; > + interrupts = ; > + }; This is wrong, and must go. There should be a separate node for the PMU of each microarchitecture, with the appropriate compatible string to represent that (see the juno dts). In this case things are messier as the same PPI number is being used across clusters. Marc (Cc'd) has been working on PPI partitions, which should allow us to support that. Thanks, Mark.