Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751796AbcDUNNQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:13:16 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49880 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751240AbcDUNNP (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:13:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=c3=a1r?= , Guenter Roeck References: <1459833007-11618-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <1459833007-11618-7-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <20160405145414.GB27359@roeck-us.net> <201604052131.52765@pali> <20160421105724.GK29406@pali> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, Douglas_Warzecha@dell.com, jdelvare@suse.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, akataria@vmware.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org From: Juergen Gross Message-ID: <5718D1D4.3040309@suse.com> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:12:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160421105724.GK29406@pali> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1198 Lines: 31 On 21/04/16 12:57, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Rohár wrote: >> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>> Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management >>>> mode on cpu 0. >>>> Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend >>>> resume cycles in between. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross >>>> --- >>>> V4: add call to get_online_cpus() >>> >>> Pali, any chance to test this ? >> >> I can test it, but just on machine where (probably) smm calls can be >> send from any cpu... Need some time for testing and I believe I can do >> that at the end of the week. > > Sorry I had absolutely no more free time last weekend :-( And same > prediction is for this weekend and also next one... Pali, I've got a Dell laptop (Latitude E6440) here. Would this device be okay for a test? What would you do for testing? In case you can give me some hints how to do a sensible test I'd do it. I've verified by adding a printk() to smp_call_on_cpu() that at least one of the modified drivers has been used during system boot. Juergen