Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753388AbcDUPLh (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:11:37 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com ([209.85.218.54]:36424 "EHLO mail-oi0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752506AbcDUPLe (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:11:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5718D5F0.8010501@oracle.com> References: <1460757793-59020-1-git-send-email-thgarnie@google.com> <1460757793-59020-4-git-send-email-thgarnie@google.com> <5718D5F0.8010501@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:11:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v1 3/4] x86, boot: Implement ASLR for kernel memory sections (x86_64) From: Thomas Garnier To: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Dmitry Vyukov , Paolo Bonzini , Dan Williams , Kees Cook , Stephen Smalley , Seth Jennings , Kefeng Wang , Jonathan Corbet , Matt Fleming , Toshi Kani , Alexander Kuleshov , Alexander Popov , Joerg Roedel , Dave Young , Baoquan He , Dave Hansen , Mark Salter , x86@kernel.org, LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Greg Thelen , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1448 Lines: 44 On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > On 04/15/2016 06:03 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote: >> >> +void __init kernel_randomize_memory(void) >> +{ >> + size_t i; >> + unsigned long addr = memory_rand_start; >> + unsigned long padding, rand, mem_tb; >> + struct rnd_state rnd_st; >> + unsigned long remain_padding = memory_rand_end - >> memory_rand_start; >> + >> + if (!kaslr_enabled()) >> + return; >> + >> + /* Take the additional space when Xen is not active. */ >> + if (!xen_domain()) >> + page_offset_base -= __XEN_SPACE; > > > This should be !xen_pv_domain(). Xen HVM guests are no different from bare > metal as far as address ranges are concerned. (Technically it's probably > !xen_pv_domain() && !xen_pvh_domain() but we can ignore PVH for now since it > is being replaced by an HVM-type guest) > In my test KASLR was disabled on Xen so I should just remove this check. I kept it in case it might change in the future. > Having said that, I am not sure I understand why page_offset_base is > shifted. I thought 0xffff800000000000 - 0xffff87ffffffffff is not supposed > to be used by anyone, whether we are running under a hypervisor or not. > It is shifted to get the most space possible, it increases the entropy available. Do you know why we should not use 0xffff800000000000 - 0xffff87ffffffffff? > -boris > >