Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753548AbcDUQIs (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:08:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47978 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751565AbcDUQIr (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:08:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:08:41 +0200 From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= To: Greg Kurz Cc: Paolo Bonzini , james.hogan@imgtec.com, mingo@redhat.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Cornelia Huck , Paul Mackerras , David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation Message-ID: <20160421160841.GD25335@potion> References: <146116689259.20666.15860134511726195550.stgit@bahia.huguette.org> <20160420182909.GB4044@potion> <20160421132958.0e9292d5@bahia.huguette.org> <20160421152916.GA30356@potion> <20160421174956.1049e0a5@bahia.huguette.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160421174956.1049e0a5@bahia.huguette.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 311 Lines: 10 2016-04-21 17:49+0200, Greg Kurz: > So we're good ? I support the change, just had a nit about API design for v2. > Whose tree can carry these patches ? (PowerPC is the only immediately affected arch, so I'd it there.) What do you think is best? My experience in this regard is pretty low.