Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:08:57 +0200
From: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Radim =?UTF-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, james.hogan@imgtec.com,
        mingo@redhat.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
        Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation
Message-ID: <20160421200857.53845535@bahia.huguette.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160421173931.GB31953@potion>
References: <146116689259.20666.15860134511726195550.stgit@bahia.huguette.org>
	<20160420182909.GB4044@potion>
	<20160421132958.0e9292d5@bahia.huguette.org>
	<20160421152916.GA30356@potion>
	<20160421174956.1049e0a5@bahia.huguette.org>
	<20160421160841.GD25335@potion>
	<20160421191850.65a07e86@bahia.huguette.org>
	<20160421173931.GB31953@potion>
Organization: IBM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 973
Lines: 33

On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:39:31 +0200
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:

> 2016-04-21 19:18+0200, Greg Kurz:
> > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:08:41 +0200
> > Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:  
> >> 2016-04-21 17:49+0200, Greg Kurz:  
> >> > So we're good ?    
> >> 
> >> I support the change, just had a nit about API design for v2.
> >>   
> > 
> > As I said in my other mail, I'm not sure we should do more... if
> > that's okay for you and you still support the change, maybe you
> > can give an Acked-by ?  
> 
> I'm evil when it comes to APIs, so bear it a bit longer. :)
> 

Fair enough :)

> >> >                 Whose tree can carry these patches ?    
> >> 
> >> (PowerPC is the only immediately affected arch, so I'd it there.)
> >> 
> >> What do you think is best?  My experience in this regard is pretty low.
> >>   
> > 
> > Maybe Paolo's tree but I guess we'd need some more acks from x86, ARM and
> > PowerPC :) KVM maintainers...  
> 
> Ok.
>