Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754139AbcDVNxu (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:53:50 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:34550 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753528AbcDVNxs (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:53:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:53:39 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Jon Hunter Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Thierry Reding Message-ID: <20160422135339.GD3217@sirena.org.uk> References: <1461255121-5245-1-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <1461255121-5245-5-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <20160422104837.GC3217@sirena.org.uk> <571A0A81.4010009@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yqoYZO0eSM9FLp66" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <571A0A81.4010009@nvidia.com> X-Cookie: Tomorrow, you can be anywhere. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: core: Add early supply resolution for a bypassed regulator X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1226 Lines: 35 --yqoYZO0eSM9FLp66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:26:57PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > OK. Sorry if I have misunderstood you here, but this sounds more like > Thierry's initial proposal [0] but ignoring the any errors returned (and > we need to fix-up the locking in this patch). In the discussion that Yes! > followed I thought we agreed to only do this for the bypass case [1]. As > far as I am concerned either will work, but to confirm we should just > always try to resolve the supply early during regulator_register(), correct? We need to only *fail* in the bypass case. --yqoYZO0eSM9FLp66 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXGiziAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQbrsH/2EuI5jdXL0dJeJjOncahUZ+ AIjgY2kulfOH6oRXFrksWa3l0Xs9ZTvlyb+pve8T84QCFo05ywhdG89Ia/IBWgU3 bRI1lphrTk5ZRZXiQkyBvWFgM56bIi6Ha5Zjp+qBiMgrzDQjf44pNP01dH+5T+ai wmoLLvC7j8J4zdglAIfYo4ts5kt3wlMiGo7OdGYzXpo2Lkq4loECdDzk5z5MynZG WX4/F2n2KEh50oJEsTfag1NX7kkaQuudGLXUtzaRrEG1ORaTzcnnRv58hUKuAhmA 2p9L9JLI00ZTNzSahlVizcS5JglPJxYKKm8+JbDzrPLQJ3mBEpuRWw2aNar86KA= =/n4j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yqoYZO0eSM9FLp66--