Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:45:18 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] clk: Add clk_hw OF clk providers
Message-ID: <20160422214518.GI13149@codeaurora.org>
References: <1461277324-27185-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
 <1461277324-27185-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1461277324-27185-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1187
Lines: 28

On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
> struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
> the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
> pointers with an OF node. Currently we ask the OF provider to
> give us a struct clk pointer for some clkspec, turn that struct
> clk into a struct clk_hw and then allocate a new struct clk to
> return to the caller.
> 
> Let's add a clk_hw based OF provider hook that returns a struct
> clk_hw directly, so that we skip the intermediate step of
> converting from struct clk to struct clk_hw. Eventually when
> we've converted all OF clk providers to struct clk_hw based APIs
> we can remove the struct clk based ones.
> 
> It should also be noted that we change the onecell provider to
> have a flex array instead of a pointer for the array of clk_hw
> pointers. This allows providers to allocate one structure of the
> correct length in one step instead of two.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project