Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:34:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:34:02 -0500 Received: from nessie.weebeastie.net ([61.8.7.205]:30128 "EHLO nessie.weebeastie.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:33:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:45:56 +1100 From: CaT To: Andrew Morton Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.65: *huge* interactivity problems Message-ID: <20030324234556.GK621@zip.com.au> References: <20030323231306.GA4704@elf.ucw.cz> <20030324171936.680f98e2.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030324171936.680f98e2.akpm@digeo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: Furball Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2261 Lines: 60 On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:19:36PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > > I'm having awfull interactivity problems. While lingvistic application > > (slm from nltools.sf.net) is running, machine is unusable. I still can > > read text in most, but can't login, can't run links, can't... For > > minutes. > > > > slm does a lot of computation over ~250MB dataset, but during stall > > disk was not active. > > Oh Pavel, this is more a whinge than a bug report. You know better ;) If he's seeing what I'm seeing then I can put my own answers to this. I get freezups, lost keystrokes and eventual shutdown of the laptop. I can reproduce it prettymuch at will be it a compilation of a piece of s/w, the kernel, mozilla loading pages or whatnot. > - How much memory does the machine have? 256 > - UP/SMP/preempt? UP with and without preempt presents the same issues. > - What do vmstat and top say? My box never survived long enough for me to be able to look. > - Did it happen in 2.5.64? 2.5.63? 2.4.20? Never had this under 2.4, Not sure wchi version now as I went to 2.5 with this laptop as soon as the freeze came and I could back it up. As for 2.5 I can definately say the sluggishness and freezes happen with 2.5.63+ (about to compile .66 and try it) but .63 does not turn the laptop off for me and .64 takes a wee bit more punishment before dieing on me. > - Does it get better if you renice stuff? >From memory, I niced (to lvl 19) a compile of mplayer that was killing my laptop and it survived. > - What steps should others take to reproduce it? Not too sure. For me it's 'when compiling don't even think of looking at an input device the wrong way or BOOM'. -- "Other countries of course, bear the same risk. But there's no doubt his hatred is mainly directed at us. After all this is the guy who tried to kill my dad." - George W. Bush Jr, Leader of the United States Regime September 26, 2002 (from a political fundraiser in Houston, Texas) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/