Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754434AbcDYKix (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:38:53 -0400
Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:11800 "EHLO
	mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754281AbcDYKiv (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:38:51 -0400
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:39:11 +0100
From: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
        Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
        Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>,
        Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
        Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
        <spear-devel@list.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: remove duplicate const qualifier
Message-ID: <20160425103911.GO32731@imgtec.com>
References: <1461577678-29517-1-git-send-email-eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
 <1461577678-29517-4-git-send-email-eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
 <20160425095715.GA2366@piout.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160425095715.GA2366@piout.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Originating-IP: [10.60.4.28]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 659
Lines: 18

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:57:15AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this requires a commit message.

OK? This seems rather pointless in this case (and even more so for the
typo fix I sent yesterday), but I guess you have some general rule to
enforce. Would this do then?
"The second `const` is unnecessary, and is simply ignored by most compilers."

> Also, you should think about separating those changes in multiple patches
> to ease inclusion in the kernel.

I'll resend patch #4 as multiple patches. What the way proper to convey
that *multiple* new patches replace *one* old one? Is it enough to just
send those as a reply to this one?

Cheers