Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752164AbcDZGGI (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 02:06:08 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]:32895 "EHLO mail-qk0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751027AbcDZGGF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 02:06:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1459951665-28708-2-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com> References: <1459951665-28708-1-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com> <1459951665-28708-2-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:36:04 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: Group vendor specific phy drivers From: Vivek Gautam To: kishon Cc: vireshk@kernel.org, Shiraz Hashim , =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Koz=C5=82owski?= , Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Linux USB Mailing List , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , CPGS , Vivek Gautam Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1051 Lines: 35 Hi Kishon, On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Adding vendor specific directories in phy to group > phy drivers under their respective vendor umbrella. > > Also updated the MAINTAINERS file to reflect the correct > directory structure for phy drivers. > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > > Changes from v1: > - Updated the MAINTAINERS file to reflect the same change > in directory structure. > - Removed PHY_PLAT config as pointed out by Kishon. > So we don't require the second patch in the v1 of this series: > [PATCH 2/2] arm: mach-spear: Enable PHY_PLAT to meet dependency > - Renamed sunxi --> allwinner; rcar --> renesas. > - Fixed error coming with qcom Makefile. Does this change looks okay now ? I think you must be planning to take this in after 4.7 rc1 is out, isn't it ? [skip] -- Best Regards Vivek Gautam Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore India