Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752158AbcDZJ2Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:28:16 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:33683 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751197AbcDZJ2N (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:28:13 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,536,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="792539030" Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:28:07 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Stefan Berger Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v11 0/4] Multi-instance vTPM proxy driver Message-ID: <20160426092807.GA32066@intel.com> References: <1461000376-2888-1-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160422165427.GA24090@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160422165427.GA24090@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1327 Lines: 30 On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:54:27PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:26:12PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > The following series of patches implements a multi-instance vTPM > > proxy driver that can dynamically create TPM 'server' and client device > > pairs. > > > > Using an ioctl on the provided /dev/vtpmx, a client-side vTPM device > > and a server side file descriptor is created. The file descriptor must > > be passed to a TPM emulator. The device driver will initialize the > > emulated TPM using TPM 1.2 or TPM 2 startup commands and it will read > > the command durations from the device in case of a TPM 1.2. The choice > > of emulated TPM device (1.2 or 2) must be provided with a flag in > > the ioctl. > > > > The patches are based on the tip of a recent checkout of Jarkko's tree > > (master branch). > > I've applied this series to my master branch. These patches have been > baking long enough in my opinion that they could be merged to next and > therefore find their way into Linux 4.7 > > Stefan, I would still require your Tested-by for the first patch before > merging because it is not as mature as other patches are. Now I have augmented Tested-by's to relevant patches and added my Signed-off-by's. I plan to merge this to the next branch tomorrow. > /Jarkko /Jarkko