Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix module probe issue if no dwarf
 support
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
References: <1461680741-12517-1-git-send-email-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20160426143453.GD11033@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
        wangnan0@huawei.com, namhyung@kernel.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <571F856E.80904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:42:46 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160426143453.GD11033@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 707
Lines: 21


On Tuesday 26 April 2016 08:04 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:55:40PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>> Perf is not able to register probe in kernel module when dwarf supprt
>> is not there(and so it goes for symtab). Perf passes full path of
>> module where only module name is required which is causing the problem.
>> This patch fixes this issue.
> Is this v3? What has changed from v2?
>
> - Arnaldo

Yes Arnaldo. But I changed it from [RFC] to [PATCH], so didn't include
version. Here is [RFC v2] link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/26/114

Changes w.r.t. [RFC v2]:
   - Swapped patch in series and move definition of find_module_name in 
other patch.

Regards,
Ravi