Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:44:46 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
        wangnan0@huawei.com, namhyung@kernel.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix module probe issue if no dwarf
 support
Message-ID: <20160426154446.GG11033@kernel.org>
References: <1461680741-12517-1-git-send-email-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20160426143453.GD11033@kernel.org>
 <571F856E.80904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <571F856E.80904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 882
Lines: 24

Em Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:42:46PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 26 April 2016 08:04 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:55:40PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> >>Perf is not able to register probe in kernel module when dwarf supprt
> >>is not there(and so it goes for symtab). Perf passes full path of
> >>module where only module name is required which is causing the problem.
> >>This patch fixes this issue.
> >Is this v3? What has changed from v2?
> >
> >- Arnaldo
> 
> Yes Arnaldo. But I changed it from [RFC] to [PATCH], so didn't include
> version. Here is [RFC v2] link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/26/114
> 
> Changes w.r.t. [RFC v2]:
>   - Swapped patch in series and move definition of find_module_name in other
> patch.

Ok, hadn't noticed the change from RFC to PATCH, and Masami just acked
it, applying.

- Arnaldo