Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:54:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:54:22 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:11525 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:54:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:59:54 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel cc: Jamie Lokier , Eric Sandall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Deprecating .gz format on kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030320211404.GA410@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1018 Lines: 23 On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] J?rn Engel wrote: > That shouldn't matter, most of the times. If you want to build the > code, you have to [bg]unzip anyway, so there is no extra cost. > And I have a hard time to think of a real-world application where you > don't want to unpack but need to verify the signature. My real world includes downloading a bunch of files and burning a CD to move them to a test environment which is completely private and has no external connections of any kind. I don't do all files that way, of course, but that is the way at least half of the 2.5 kernels I've used were moved to a machine which was non-production. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/