Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932377AbcDZXlB (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:41:01 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:40994 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932195AbcDZX1Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:27:16 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Arnd Bergmann" , "Hannes Reinecke" , "Sebastian Herbszt" , "Ewan D. Milne" , "Martin K. Petersen" Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:02:24 +0200 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.2 048/115] lpfc: fix misleading indentation In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8426:ae4:c500:9cba:69ae:962d:6167 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2131 Lines: 58 3.2.80-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Arnd Bergmann commit aeb6641f8ebdd61939f462a8255b316f9bfab707 upstream. gcc-6 complains about the indentation of the lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array() call in lpfc_online(), which clearly doesn't look right: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_online': drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2880:3: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Wmisleading-indentation] lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2863:2: note: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not if (vports != NULL) ^~ Looking at the patch that introduced this code, it's clear that the behavior is correct and the indentation is wrong. This fixes the indentation and adds curly braces around the previous if() block for clarity, as that is most likely what caused the code to be misindented in the first place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Fixes: 549e55cd2a1b ("[SCSI] lpfc 8.2.2 : Fix locking around HBA's port_list") Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c @@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba) } vports = lpfc_create_vport_work_array(phba); - if (vports != NULL) + if (vports != NULL) { for (i = 0; i <= phba->max_vports && vports[i] != NULL; i++) { struct Scsi_Host *shost; shost = lpfc_shost_from_vport(vports[i]); @@ -2538,7 +2538,8 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba) vports[i]->fc_flag |= FC_VPORT_NEEDS_INIT_VPI; spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock); } - lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports); + } + lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports); lpfc_unblock_mgmt_io(phba); return 0;