Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:09:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:09:01 -0500 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:9736 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:08:49 -0500 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200011011808.VAA07484@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), ak@suse.DE (Andi Kleen) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 21:08:11 +0300 (MSK) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20001101093839.A16274@gruyere.muc.suse.de> from "Andi Kleen" at Nov 1, 0 11:45:00 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > What about the fact anyone can crash a box using ioctls on net > > devices and waiting for an unload - was this fixed ? What do you mean? If I understood you correclty, this has been fixed in early 2.3 and never reappeared since that time. > The ioctls of network devices are generally unsafe on SMP, because > they run with kernel lock dropped now but are mostly not safe to do so. Andi, pleeeease, stop FUDing. If you see some bug, fix it. I do not see. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/