Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752905AbcD0FuG (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:50:06 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56331 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752641AbcD0FuE (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:50:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] workqueue: fix ghost PENDING flag while doing MQ IO To: Tejun Heo , Peter Hurley References: <1461597771-25352-1-git-send-email-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> <20160425154847.GZ7822@mtj.duckdns.org> <571EC2B9.6000802@hurleysoftware.com> <20160426151507.GK7822@mtj.duckdns.org> <571FA51F.2040702@hurleysoftware.com> <20160426174513.GM7822@mtj.duckdns.org> Cc: Roman Pen , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells From: Hannes Reinecke Message-ID: <57205309.2060708@suse.de> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 07:50:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160426174513.GM7822@mtj.duckdns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1378 Lines: 39 On 04/26/2016 07:45 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Peter. > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:27:59AM -0700, Peter Hurley wrote: >>> It's unlikely to make any measureable difference. Is xchg() actually >>> cheaper than store + rmb? >> >> store + mfence (full barrier), yes. Roughly 2x faster. >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/607 > > Ah, didn't know that. Thanks for the pointer. > >>> I'm not necessarily against making all clearings of >>> PENDING to be followed by a rmb or use xhcg. Reasons 2-4 are pretty >>> weak tho. >> >> I agree 2 and 3 are not the best reasons. >> Actually, it looks that I'm in the minority anyway, and that style-wise, >> naked barrier is preferred. > > As long as what's happening is clearly documented, I think either is > fine. I'm gonna go with Roman's mb patch for -stable fix but think > it'd be nice to have a separate patch to consolidate the paths which > clear PENDING and make them use xchg. If you can spin up a patch for > that, I'd be happy to apply it to wq/for-3.7. > ^^^ Ah. Time warp. I knew it would happen eventually :-) Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg GF: F. Imend?rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)