Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752661AbcD0SX4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:23:56 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.180.65]:33366 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbcD0SXy (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:23:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:23:51 -0500 From: Alex Thorlton To: Alex Thorlton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Fleming , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Russ Anderson , Dimitri Sivanich , mike travis , Nathan Zimmer , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [BUG] x86/efi: MMRs no longer properly mapped after switch to isolated page table Message-ID: <20160427182351.GC113599@stormcage.americas.sgi.com> References: <20160427154132.GB113599@stormcage.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160427154132.GB113599@stormcage.americas.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5689 Lines: 112 On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:41:32AM -0500, Alex Thorlton wrote: Adding Boris to Cc. > Hey guys, > > We've hit an issue that we haven't seen before on recent community > kernels. Hoping that you can provide some insight. > > Late last week I hit this bad paging request in uv_system_init on one of > our small UV systems: > > 8<--- > [ 0.355998] UV: Found UV2000/3000 hub > [ 0.360088] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8800fb600000 > [ 0.367882] IP: [] uv_system_init+0x1f8/0x1051 > [ 0.374604] PGD 1f83067 PUD 0 > [ 0.378030] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP > [ 0.381652] Modules linked in: > [ 0.385069] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc3-community-4.6-rc2+ #454 > [ 0.394003] Hardware name: SGI UV3000/UV3000, BIOS SGI UV 3000 series BIOS 01/15/2015 > [ 0.402743] task: ffff88086ee18000 ti: ffff88086ee1c000 task.ti: ffff88086ee1c000 > [ 0.411097] RIP: 0010:[] [] uv_system_init+0x1f8/0x1051 > [ 0.420530] RSP: 0000:ffff88086ee1fdb0 EFLAGS: 00010286 > [ 0.426458] RAX: ffff8800fb600000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000c780 > [ 0.434421] RDX: 00000000fa000000 RSI: 0000000000000246 RDI: 0000000000000246 > [ 0.442385] RBP: ffff88086ee1fe48 R08: 00000000fffffffe R09: 0000000000000000 > [ 0.450348] R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000146 R12: 000000000000c780 > [ 0.458312] R13: 000000000000a0f0 R14: 0000000000000037 R15: 0000000000000038 > [ 0.466277] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880870c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 0.475307] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [ 0.481718] CR2: ffff8800fb600000 CR3: 0000000001a06000 CR4: 00000000001406f0 > [ 0.489682] Stack: > [ 0.491924] 0000000000000037 0000000000000038 ffff88086ee1fdd0 ffffffff810bef29 > [ 0.500219] ffff88086ee1fe28 ffffffff8116426d ffff880800000010 ffff88086ee1fe38 > [ 0.508517] ffff88086ee1fdf8 ffffffff8116426d 0000000000000002 0000000000000001 > [ 0.516810] Call Trace: > [ 0.519542] [] ? vprintk_default+0x29/0x40 > [ 0.525957] [] ? printk+0x4d/0x4f > [ 0.531497] [] ? printk+0x4d/0x4f > [ 0.537041] [] native_smp_prepare_cpus+0x299/0x2e4 > [ 0.544232] [] kernel_init_freeable+0xc3/0x220 > [ 0.551035] [] kernel_init+0xe/0x110 > [ 0.556869] [] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40 > [ 0.562893] [] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 > [ 0.568723] Code: 65 48 03 05 1d b8 49 7e 80 78 14 02 ba 00 00 00 fa 76 0b 48 89 c8 65 48 03 05 07 b8 49 7e 48 b8 00 00 60 01 00 88 ff ff 48 09 d0 <48> 8b 00 88 c3 48 c1 e8 06 41 bd 01 00 00 00 88 c1 83 e3 3f 4c > [ 0.590530] RIP [] uv_system_init+0x1f8/0x1051 > [ 0.597341] RSP > [ 0.601230] CR2: ffff8800fb600000 > [ 0.604933] ---[ end trace 06918ff61c5d4cab ]--- > [ 0.610091] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000009 > --->8 > > A bit of digging will tell us that this is the failing line: > > m_n_config.v = uv_read_local_mmr(UVH_RH_GAM_CONFIG_MMR ); > > A bisect (with a bit of extra digging into a merge commit) led me to > commit 67a9108ed4313 ("x86/efi: Build our own page table structures") as > being the first bad commit. > > After a bit of poking around, I found that the part of this change that > is actually breaking things for us is the fact that the EFI memory > regions are no longer being mapped into the trampoline_pgd in > __map_region. > > Just as a quick test, I made this small change and it got my UV to boot: > > 8<--- > diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c > index 49e4dd4..15bf5df 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c > +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c > @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ static void __init __map_region(efi_memory_desc_t *md, u64 va) > { > unsigned long flags = _PAGE_RW; > unsigned long pfn; > + pgd_t *tramp_pgd = (pgd_t *)__va(real_mode_header->trampoline_pgd); > pgd_t *pgd = efi_pgd; > > if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB)) > @@ -305,6 +306,10 @@ static void __init __map_region(efi_memory_desc_t *md, u64 va) > if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pfn, va, md->num_pages, flags)) > pr_warn("Error mapping PA 0x%llx -> VA 0x%llx!\n", > md->phys_addr, va); > + > + if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(tramp_pgd, pfn, va, md->num_pages, flags)) > + pr_warn("Error mapping in trampoline_pgd PA 0x%llx -> VA 0x%llx!\n", > + md->phys_addr, va); > } > > void __init efi_map_region(efi_memory_desc_t *md) > --->8 > > From what I know, this works because the first PGD entry (the one > containing the identity mappings) of the trampoline_pgd is shared with > the main kernel PGD (init_level4_pgt), so when __map_region maps this > stuff into the trampoline_pgd, we get it in the kernel PGD as well. > > The way I understand it, the motivation behind this change is to isolate > the EFI runtime services code/data from the regular kernel page tables, > but it appears that we've isolated a bit more than that. I do > understand that if we were doing an actual EFI callback, we'd switch > over to the efi_pgd, where we'd have this stuff mapped in, but, until > now, we've been able to read these MMRs using the regular kernel page > table without issues. > > Please let me know what you guys think about this issue, and if you have > any suggestions for possible solutions. Any input is greatly > appreciated! > > - Alex