Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752902AbcD1Isw (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:48:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:33413 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752430AbcD1Ist (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:48:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:48:44 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mike Travis Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Len Brown , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uv4-kernel@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/21] X86_64, UV: Remove Support for UV1 Message-ID: <20160428084844.GB16679@gmail.com> References: <20160428005457.471061412@asylum.americas.sgi.com> <20160428005458.729286570@asylum.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160428005458.729286570@asylum.americas.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 351 Lines: 13 * Mike Travis wrote: > The UV1 architecture is no longer being supported in future Linux kernels, so Is such hardware still out there? If yes then please don't break it. You might not want to test it, and if no-one else does it will eventually and inevitably bit rot, but please don't intentionally cripple it .. Thanks, Ingo