Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752571AbcD1SHi (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:07:38 -0400
Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:33973 "EHLO
	bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751837AbcD1SHg (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:07:36 -0400
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:07:28 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Phil Jensen <pjensen@evernote.com>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/217] 3.16.35-rc1 review
Message-ID: <20160428180728.GB4726@roeck-us.net>
References: <lsq.1461711740.434915673@decadent.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <lsq.1461711740.434915673@decadent.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Authenticated_sender: guenter@roeck-us.net
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: guenter@roeck-us.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: guenter@roeck-us.net
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1404
Lines: 48

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:02:20AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.35 release.
> There are 217 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat Apr 30 22:00:00 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
Build results:
	total: 138 pass: 119 fail: 19
Failed builds:
	alpha:allmodconfig
	arc:allnoconfig
	arm:allmodconfig
	arm:imx_v6_v7_defconfig
	arm:shmobile_defconfig
	arm64:allmodconfig
	i386:allyesconfig
	i386:allmodconfig
	m68k:allmodconfig
	m68k:allnoconfig
	mips:allmodconfig
	parisc:allmodconfig
	powerpc:allmodconfig
	s390:allmodconfig
	sparc32:allmodconfig
	sparc64:allmodconfig
	x86_64:allyesconfig
	x86_64:allmodconfig
	xtensa:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:
	total: 98 pass: 93 fail: 5
Failed tests:
	arm:kzm:imx_v6_v7_defconfig
	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
	arm:smdkc210:multi_v7_defconfig:exynos4210-smdkv310
	arm64:smp:defconfig
	arm64:nosmp:defconfig

A quick glance through the build results suggests that the build failures can
probably be fixed by pulling in a couple of missing patches. For the qemu tests,
I'll run a comparison against 3.16.7 to see if those are new failures.

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter