Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752725AbcD1SnL (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:43:11 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:51943 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751513AbcD1SnJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:43:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:43:03 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Nathan Sullivan Cc: Nicolas Ferre , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Message-ID: <20160428184303.GR29024@lunn.ch> References: <1461854802-8142-1-git-send-email-nathan.sullivan@ni.com> <57222FCE.8050407@atmel.com> <20160428155556.GA8333@nathan3500-linux-VM> <20160428163207.GP29024@lunn.ch> <20160428175619.GA8791@nathan3500-linux-VM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160428175619.GA8791@nathan3500-linux-VM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 407 Lines: 11 > I agree that is a valid fix for AT91, however it won't solve our problem, since > we have no children on the second ethernet MAC in our devices' device trees. I'm > starting to feel like our second MAC shouldn't even really register the MDIO bus > since it isn't being used - maybe adding a DT property to not have a bus is a > better option? status = "disabled" would be the unusual way. Andrew