Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:47:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:47:09 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:60571 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:47:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3E81B212.40101@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:58:42 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Hedrick CC: Matt Mackall , ptb@it.uc3m.es, Justin Cormack , linux kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] ENBD for 2.5.64 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1018 Lines: 26 Andre Hedrick wrote: > We have almost finalized our initiator to be submitted under OSL/GPL. > This will be a full RFC ERL=2 w/ Sync-n-Steering. That's pretty good news. Also, I tangent and mention that I have been won over WRT OSL: with its more tight "lawyerspeak" and mutual patent defense clauses, I consider OSL to be a "better GPL" license. I would in fact love to see the Linux kernel relicensed under OSL. I think that would close some "holes" that exist with the GPL, and give us a better legal standing. But relicensing the kernel would be huge political undertaking, and I sure as hell don't have the energy, even if it possible. No idea if Linus, Alan, Andrew, or any of the other major contributors would go for it, either. Jeff, the radical - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/