Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753612AbcD2MtN (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:49:13 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:52927 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753348AbcD2MtL (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:49:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:49:06 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Josh Cartwright Cc: Nathan Sullivan , Nicolas Ferre , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Message-ID: <20160429124906.GD4053@lunn.ch> References: <20160428155556.GA8333@nathan3500-linux-VM> <20160428163207.GP29024@lunn.ch> <20160428175619.GA8791@nathan3500-linux-VM> <20160428184303.GR29024@lunn.ch> <20160428185527.GA8851@nathan3500-linux-VM> <20160428185932.GU29024@lunn.ch> <20160428210357.GB30217@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com> <20160428212315.GC12753@lunn.ch> <20160429003459.GC30217@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com> <20160429122501.GD30217@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160429122501.GD30217@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1631 Lines: 53 > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c > index eec3200..d843bc9 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c > @@ -419,11 +419,62 @@ static int macb_mii_probe(struct net_device *dev) > return 0; > } > > +static int macb_mii_of_init(struct macb *bp, struct device_node *np) > +{ > + struct device_node *mdio; > + int err, i; > + > + mdio = of_get_child_by_name(np, "mdio"); > + if (mdio) > + return of_mdiobus_register(bp->mii_bus, mdio); We want to encourage driver writers to use an mdio subnode inside there MAC node. So i wounder if this looking for the child and using it should go into the core code? Florian: What do you think? > + > + dev_warn(&bp->pdev->dev, > + "using deprecated PHY probing mechanism. Please update device tree."); > + > + /* try dt phy registration */ > + err = of_mdiobus_register(bp->mii_bus, np); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + /* fallback to standard phy registration if no phy were > + * found during dt phy registration > + */ > + if (!phy_find_first(bp->mii_bus)) { I would also suggest putting a warning here, saying that PHYs should be listed in the device tree. > + for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) { > + struct phy_device *phydev; > + > + phydev = mdiobus_scan(bp->mii_bus, i); > + if (IS_ERR(phydev)) { > + err = PTR_ERR(phydev); FYI: There is a change making its way through which will mean mdiobus_scan() will return -ENODEV where there is nothing on the bus at that address, rather than the current NULL. You will need to adopt this here. Andrew