Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 21:43:38 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues
Message-ID: <20160429194338.GA22509@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1457038929.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
 <5723A353.7060209@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5723A353.7060209@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 619
Lines: 19


* Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> 
> I've heard through the grapevine that there's some concern that we
> should not be bothering to enable XSAVES because there's not a
> sufficient use case for it. [...]

So I have no fundamental objections against this series - I didn't apply it back 
in March because not all patches had your Reviewed-by tag. Basically after you 
sorted out all the XSAVE dynamic feature detection/sizing issues I was a happy 
camper and have no objection against XSAVES.

Could you please send a refreshed version against the latestest tip:master?

Thanks,

	Ingo