Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752737AbcD2Vux (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:50:53 -0400 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:59758 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751303AbcD2Vuv (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:50:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 22:50:17 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Doug Anderson Cc: Ulf Hansson , Jaehoon Chung , Shawn Lin , Adrian Hunter , Stefan Agner , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Brian Norris , Dmitry Torokhov , Heiko Stuebner , Jisheng Zhang , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Venu Byravarasu , Lars-Peter Clausen , Jon Hunter , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Grant Grundler , Kumar Gala , "Luca Porzio (lporzio)" , Rob Herring , Chaotian Jing , Sergei Shtylyov , Sudeep Holla , zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Patches to allow consistent mmc / mmcblk numbering w/ device tree Message-ID: <20160429215017.GC19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1461951139-6109-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <20160429181248.GW19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20160429195741.GY19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20160429211328.GZ19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20160429212920.GA19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1341 Lines: 30 On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:39:35PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: [didn't read most of your reply] > Really I just reposted it several times because I notice that you seem > to ignore many points of my emails. I was really hoping to get you to > address this point. I notice that you still didn't. Either you are > just trying to annoy me, or you don't have an answer to how my patch > series hurts you. I don't see you treating Rob with the same contempt that you have treated me in this thread, despite Rob and myself both telling you basically the same thing. Maybe you should try some of the solutions we're suggesting, rather than hammering away at your keyboard because you disagree with the feedback that you're getting, to see whether these other solutions resolve it. I notice that your replies focuses solely on UUIDs to my messages, despite *my* messages also talking about labels. Therefore, I think you are _not_ actually reading my replies - if you were, then you would have noticed that I've been making the same suggestion as Rob. Also, the speed at which you hammer out your replies (in as little as minutes) suggests that you aren't reading them. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.