Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 21:17:34 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup __pvclock_read_cycles to remove useless variables
Message-ID: <20160430191734.GB4084@pd.tnic>
References: <1461567194-2007-1-git-send-email-mnghuan@gmail.com>
 <20160430132420.GA4084@pd.tnic>
 <CALCETrVy6=N+6oRSdSYgBikpfJGDTfCfV13a_HcWVfE-zdm8hg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVy6=N+6oRSdSYgBikpfJGDTfCfV13a_HcWVfE-zdm8hg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 444
Lines: 14

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:47:49AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Take a look at vread_pvclock.  I decided that __pvclock_read_cycles
> was too ugly to use and was very slow and I just gave up and rewrote
> it.

Should we kill __pvclock_read_cycles in favor of vread_pvclock? It looks
doable at a quick scan...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--