Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:34:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:34:41 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:16280 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:34:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:34:23 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: "Carl D. Speare" Cc: Quim K Holland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: need to suggest a good FS: Message-ID: <20010223183423.N5465@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20010223143235.E5465@khan.acc.umu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from carlds@attglobal.net on Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:20:34PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:20:34PM -0500, Carl D. Speare wrote: > Actually there isn't. Hmmm, sounds like I'll have some hacking to do... > > But I have to ask if this is something that would actually be desirable. > Given how rare it is, does the Linux community actually want to have YAFS > (yet another file system) added to the list, especially for an even more > rare OS like OpenServer 5.0.x? Maybe now that Caldera is involved more > with SCO, it might be something that happens in a few months anyway... Make a read-only version; this will make transition from HTFS to {ext2fs, reiserfs, xfs, jfs, ...} easy. Read-only also has the property that it won't cause on-disk corruption; at worst, you get in-memory corruption... /David _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/